The BBC’s undercover investigation was carried out over a series of targeted nights in different urban settings, where it engaged with operators who were alleged to film women without their consent. Using portable recording devices, the team recorded interactions that began with a concealed approach, followed by the deployment of hidden cameras, and concluded with the transfer of captured material to a local distribution network. The footage obtained by the BBC showed the series of steps involved in acquiring subjects, the types of camera equipment employed and the logistics of sending the finished videos for commercial use. _2_The findings identified that the private industry in question engaged in at least 38 documented episodes of nighttime footage capture over a four‑month period. Each episode included the use of a small, handheld camera that was inconspicuously attached to the operator’s clothing, and the distribution of the resulting videos was facilitated through an online platform that relied on consumer payments. The investigation also recorded that the majority of videos involved the filming of subjects in semi‑public spaces, such as alleyways and doorways, where recognition could be difficult. The BBC’s evidence indicated a structured chain of command that oversaw the processing and sale of the footage, suggesting the presence of an organized commercial enterprise. There were no indications of physical harm; rather, the emphasis remained on the violation of privacy rights via non‑consensual visual capture. _3_The BBC’s report recommends a review of local enforcement provisions that address non‑consensual filming, and underscores the need for stricter regulatory oversight of distribution platforms. Law enforcement agencies are advised to investigate the aforementioned chain of command with an emphasis on tracing the flow of digital content and identifying key personnel involved. The investigation is expected to prompt discussion at the national level about aligning existing privacy statutes with the realities of covert surveillance operations in the age of digital rapid distribution. The outcome of this inquiry may result in more robust procedural frameworks designed to prevent similar occurrences and safeguard individual privacy in urban environments. @