The new legislative proposal, introduced by the parliamentary committee, seeks to impose stricter housing restrictions on individuals convicted of violent crimes. By limiting their ability to reside in certain zones—particularly those near schools, parks, and sports facilities—authorities aim to reduce the likelihood of future offenses. Two women, who have previously suffered violence from a former spouse, expressed that they feel a tangible sense of relief that this measure could prevent them from facing such risks as the offender remains legally restricted from living in those key residential areas.

_b_These restrictions establish a framework that requires offenders to undergo a mandatory residential review annually. Failure to comply could result in fines or revocation of safe haven status, placing them in supervised or designated correctional housing sites. While critics argue that this approach may raise humanitarian concerns, supporters believe it provides an additional safeguard for family safety and public confidence. By clarifying where convicted individuals are allowed and where they are prohibited, the policy clarifies legal boundaries and reinforces community trust in law enforcement practices._

The broader public response reflects a divide between those prioritizing personal safety and those concerned about civil liberties. Policymakers emphasize that the new regulations are designed to balance reparative justice with preventive measures, stressing that the legal framework will accompany regular court oversight to avoid arbitrary enforcement. For families affected by violent crime, the new limits offer a form of reassurance that the criminal justice system is taking concrete steps to create safer living conditions for the next generation of citizens.