The proposed bill in the United Kingdom has drawn the attention of local campaign groups concerned that it may grant an exemption to certain security services. The core of the proposal is a legislative measure designed to curb cover‑ups, but supporters argue that the language could leave gaps for agencies that normally fall under its scope. The debate centers around the balance between efficient law enforcement procedures and ensuring that all public bodies remain fully accountable to the public. The concern is that an exemption could create a loophole that undermines the bill’s purpose by permitting entities to retain secrecy in specific contexts. The policy makers therefore must consider whether the exemption should be included or whether amendments are required to preserve the bill’s integrity. _2_ The campaigners emphasize that the quote of “cover‑ups” as the main clause of the legislation was intended to enforce transparency among all branches of governance, including security service operations. By specifically enumerating the bodies that are affected, the legislative text can maintain a level of clarity and predictability. If there is no phrase that explicitly states the exemption of security services from the clause, the law may be termed too broad, inviting interpretations that can neglect the necessity of document disclosure even within the context of confidential security protocols. Appendix one of the draft treats the authority to exclude from the clause as multiple class‑specific exceptions, a principle that has been subject to further scrutiny. _3_ The possibility of re‑recourse based on similar questions in prior legislations suggests that the current debate will involve careful review and potential revision. The political landscape reveals that stakeholders across the sectors are seeking a balance that favors accountability. The eventual outcome will shape how community oversight is administered and the extent to which law‑making authority enforces transparency measures across all public entities, including those dealing with security.