In a decision that underscores the growing scrutiny of online conduct in France, a Paris court found ten individuals guilty of malicious cyber‑bullying targeted at Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron._2_The defendants, who were identified by the prosecution as a mix of private citizens and undisclosed associates, engaged in an online campaign that included repeated insults, false allegations, and the broadcasting of unverified information on social media platforms. The court documented that the harassment persisted for several months, culminating in a coordinated effort to spread defamatory content that was deemed harmful to the personal reputation and public image of the presidential wife. At trial, the court considered the relentless nature of the attacks, the intention to cause distress, and the demonstrable impact on Brigitte Macron’s personal life. Each offender was convicted under France’s civil liability laws that address harassment, as well as specific statutes governing online defamation. The sentences vary among the defendants, with penalties ranging from fines to suspended imprisonment, depending on the severity of the individual actions and prior legal histories. The ruling, on which several media outlets reported, follows a broader legislative push in France to tighten controls on cyber‑bullying and online defamation, reflected in recent amendments to the 2017 Digital Republic Law that allow for expedited proceedings in cases involving public officials and their families. The judgment carries both a deterrent effect for potential harassers and a reaffirmation that digital spaces are subject to the same accountability measures that govern physical interactions. By holding these individuals legally liable, the court signals an ongoing commitment to safeguarding the dignity of public figures against the pervasive shadow of online hostility, emphasizing the role of judicial intervention in addressing non‑physical forms of aggression in contemporary society._3_ The broader implications of this case extend beyond the individuals involved; it stands as a bellwether for how French courts are adapting to the challenges posed by digital platforms. With increased collaboration between law enforcement agencies and social media regulators, the decision reinforces the premise that online behavior carrying false or harassing content can and will be adjudicated under civil and criminal law frameworks. This case may influence future litigation involving online harassment, prompting the deployment of improved reporting mechanisms and greater punitive measures for repeat offenders, thereby contributing to the broader goal of fostering a safer online environment for public figures and the public alike.