The reporting outlet, The Wall Street Journal, posed a question to the president regarding the actions of an immigration agent who was involved in a fatal shooting in Minneapolis. In response, the president stated that his administration was “reviewing everything” in relation to the incident. This comment signifies an official acknowledgment and a potential re‑examination of procedures surrounding the case. _2_ The incident at its core involves an immigration agent who discharged a weapon, resulting in the death of a man in Minneapolis. While details such as the identity of the victim and operational context remain undisclosed in the brief exchange, the event is recognized as a significant matter warranting scrutiny. Given the federal agency’s oversight responsibilities, the administration’s commitment to review implies a systematic assessment of investigative protocols, accountability mechanisms, and inter‑agency coordination. _3_ The statement underscores a procedural stance rather than a policy shift, suggesting that standard investigative frameworks will be engaged without indicating immediate changes to law enforcements or immigration enforcement practices. The designation “reviewing everything” typically encompasses the collection of evidence, communication logs, and adherence to legal standards governing use of force. It also opens the door for internal audits of command decisions made by the agent and any recommendations for procedural adjustments. By signaling a comprehensive review, the administration demonstrates responsiveness to public and institutional concerns tied to law‑enforcement conduct while maintaining an operational focus on fact‑finding and procedural integrity.