Many papers sketched their front pages around headlines that fixated on Iran following comments from US President Donald Trump. The headlines reflected the immediate media reaction to Trump’s public remarks, framing the narrative within the broader context of US-Iran relations. In these headlines, the name “Iran” frequently appeared in bold, emphasizing the central focus of the coverage. _2_ The reports aimed to inform readers about the potential escalations while highlighting the political stakes of any new policy moves. Although the articles differed in tone—some adopting cautionary language, others adopting a more neutral style—they commonly underscored the significance of the situation in Tehran’s political and security environment. They confirmed that the press was responsive to Trump’s statements, with many outlets opting to present a straightforward account of events while avoiding emotive or partisan commentary. _3_ This concentration on Iran in the press demonstrates the role of journalistic framing in shaping public understanding of international developments. The trend toward a focused coverage of Iran after Trump’s threats suggests a deliberate editorial choice to draw attention to the potential ramifications of policy shifts, prompting audiences to remain engaged with the unfolding geopolitical panorama.