The State of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against the federal administration in an effort to prevent federal immigration agents from operating in the Twin Cities. The legal action centers on a claim that the deployment of these agents constitutes a federal intrusion that infringes on state sovereignty and the jurisdiction of local law enforcement. Attorney General Keith Ellison has described the proposed presence as a “federal invasion of the Twin Cities,” underscoring the administration’s perceived disregard for the state’s autonomy. _2_ Under the lawsuit, Minnesota seeks an injunction that would bar the use of federal immigration officers within its borders until the court resolves issues related to jurisdictional authority, the scope of federal power, and potential conflicts with state statutes. The petition cites statutes that govern the delineation of authority between state and federal entities and posits that the deployment could undermine the responsibility of state officers to maintain public safety within their communities. The filing also requests clarity regarding how federal personnel would integrate with existing local agencies, framing the need for a cooperative framework. _3_ As the case moves forward, its outcome could set a precedent for the manner in which federal immigration activities are conducted in other states. The lawsuit reflects growing concerns in several states about the extent of nationwide immigration enforcement programs and the right of states to manage local law enforcement matters. Awaiting judicial review, the suit remains a focal point for discussions on the balance between federal objectives and state governance.