Campaigners campaigning for the legalization of assisted dying have formally requested an extension of the review period afforded to parliamentarians, citing insufficient time to evaluate the bill’s provisions thoroughly before the deadline imposed by the legislative calendar._2_The motion follows concerns that the current schedule will not allow the House and its committees to scrutinize the proposed statutory changes, especially in light of the complexities surrounding patient eligibility criteria, safeguards, and potential unintended consequences. Stakeholders within the movement argue that extending the timetable would facilitate a more comprehensive debate and reduce the risk of procedural hasty decisions. The request has met with mixed reactions; some lawmakers emphasize the need to adhere to the parliamentary timetable, while others acknowledge the ethical nuances that demand careful consideration. _3_If the extension is granted, the bill would proceed through the standard stages of committee hearings, public consultations, and a final vote, potentially smoothing the way for eventual enactment. Should the request be denied, supporters fear that an incomplete review could undermine the bill’s integrity and the welfare of future patients. The outcome carries implications for how legislatures balance urgent policy needs against procedural safeguards and mirrors broader international trends in regulating medically assisted death.